I prefer web over app. I tried a site which was said to be free. signup was fine so i started to use the site only to realise to see my matches or start chats i had to pay for a “premium” account or something. that really annoys me and it’s a waste of my time so does anyone know any good dating sites which are actually free, as in i don’t have to pay to use the site for what it should be used for? thx in advance 👍

oh and I’m looking for men, forgot to specify lol

  • GladiusB
    link
    fedilink
    86 hours ago

    Dating sites are there to make money off of desperation. Matches are intentionally superficial or completely off base. They won’t give away a product that you are willing to pay for. Because then they lost two customers.

  • @inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I never gave HER a dime but it was the platform I met my eventual wife on. However unless you’re looking to meet other ladies, it’s probably not the app for you.

  • @Pondis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1210 hours ago

    Im a 40m divorcee and I am absolutely out of my depth thinking about dating.

    I have looked at the apps and sites and they never go anywhere for me. No matches or conversations that go no where.

    I sort of think that meeting someone will happen when it happens, but I really miss that excitement of learning all about someone and talking all night.

    Im also interested in meeting someone outside of my country, because Id love to experience something new, but that makes me look like a scammer.

  • Lord Wiggle
    link
    fedilink
    1613 hours ago

    I like OK Cupid. It works perfectly without paying and matches are better as they are based on questions you answer and profiles contain more info. So it’s less evaluating lifestock like Tinder.

    There’s also Bumble, it used to be that the woman needs to start talking when matched within 24h otherwise the match disappears. This is so women won’t get spammed by loads of men. I heard they would change it, but I’m not sure if they actually did. It works fine without paying.

    There’s Boo, which I think is mostly for autistic and introvert people. Works fine with the free version.

    There’s Feeld, which works great without paying. The focus is mainly on sex, not so much relationship material imo.

    • Bumble did chenge that. Now the woman decides who has to start the convo once they match. You can also set some prompts for the other person to reply to.

    • @Occultist0178@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      812 hours ago

      Ok Cupid used to be kind that, but they completely butchered the question part of it, in my opinion it is no longer useful. Also as a white cis male you get spammed there by literally hundreds of accounts from the Philippines. Makes the whole thing useless in my opinion

      • Lord Wiggle
        link
        fedilink
        311 hours ago

        Yeah that’s true. About 60% of the women I see are from Asia / Africa / South America.

        I wish they would disable the custom location feature to solve this clutter.

        I live in The Netherlands, there are enough people here on the app to make it worth while. It’s how I met my new partner.

        • @thatradomguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          25 hours ago

          I live in The Netherlands, there are enough people here on the app to make it worth while. It’s how I met my new partner.

          Congrats btw

        • @Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          26 hours ago

          I wish they would disable the custom location feature to solve this clutter.

          It’s REALLY useful for travelling/migration. I made a penpal/IRL friend through there using this very feature. They should deal with it by reports and etc.

          • Lord Wiggle
            link
            fedilink
            24 hours ago

            Yeah, that’s how I met my current partner. She lives in Portugal but had her location in my city. It does have benefits, but it also extremely clutters the app with gold diggers from the other side of the globe.

      • Lord Wiggle
        link
        fedilink
        612 hours ago

        I’m not a big fan though. It’s also a sort of social media. There are many people on there from Asia and Africa, cluttering the user base.

        I had 3 matches which ended in extended conversations, but in all 3 cases (don’t know if it’s coincidence) they were trying to cheat on their partner. I’m poly, I don’t mind sharing, but cheating on someone is not going to happen with me.

        About poly, OK Cupid has the option to say you’re monogamous, polyamorous (with account links possible) or open to either. So it’s a great app for finding poly people or focus on mono people without matching with the poly ones (saves a conversation)

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Yeah… I have been on there since making that comment and just looking in a 40 mile radius, a majority of the profiles I am seeing are unvaccinated red hats. 😮‍💨

          The idea is still nice, but… You’re still at the mercy of who is actually near enough to meet. And I live in dumbfuckville.

          • Lord Wiggle
            link
            fedilink
            111 hours ago

            Sorry to say, but there’s no app available which creates better people in your town haha

            Maybe move to a city?

            OK Cupid has the option to set your location manually. You can check somewhere else if there’s someone nice. I hate this option, it clutters the app with Asian and African women wanting to meet someone abroad. But it may be nice for you to get better results.

  • @Beebabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Great question. Tried the paid thing (38f). Lots of decent (superficially) matches, none of whom shared my values or interest. It was a huge waste of money across apps.

  • @lordnikon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3918 hours ago

    Yeah it’s a known thing that match bought all the dating sites and turned them in to tinder and made the algorithm to not to help you find someone but just keep you on the site. So they just watch your patterns to keep you searching and give you just enough hope so you don’t leave / stop paying.

    The question i have is not even about dating but just making IRL friends. Stuff like meet-up is full of scams and professional networking. Where what I’m looking for is a site where I can find people that share my hobbies/interests.

    • @thatradomguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      24 hours ago

      The question i have is not even about dating but just making IRL friends. Stuff like meet-up is full of scams and professional networking. Where what I’m looking for is a site where I can find people that share my hobbies/interests.

      I’m struggling with finding this kind of culture home too. I feel like meetup used to have more events in my area—and I’m practically in the the city and near big metro area—but ever since pandemic, I have no clue where to find people. Not that I did before because I’ve been a shut-in for most of my life but hot damn, I feel like eventually I will just finally give up and show up to a board game/card game event even though I’m not good at them. I would love if there was a calligraphy type of group thing in my area but I digress.

      • @lordnikon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 hours ago

        Yeah im in a metro as well. It’s a challenge with just showing up for me is my disability makes people shy away from engaging with me. Like they are not mean or anything but they just don’t want to deal with the perceived awkwardness of interacting with someone who can’t walk unassisted.

        • FundMECFS
          link
          fedilink
          11 hour ago

          Yeah this is a big thing. The abled person gaze is something else.

    • @orgrinrt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      714 hours ago

      They are doing an awful job of it, if that is the case. Most of my last few relationships, serious and casual alike, were from tinder, and those few that weren’t, were surprisingly enough, from jodel. But tinder has been the cultural standard here for a longish while now, and most everyone I know, friends and acquaintances, have met their partners from there. And after passing 30, not many are single anymore, and only very few in casual/serial relationships. So most are in stable committed relationships, of which most were from tinder.

      Personally I never spent any money there and I don’t know any that have (though they could just be omitting it or it never just came up, I digress), yet I don’t really know many single people anymore either thanks to it.

      So if their intention is keeping people searching, they really make it way too convenient and nice an experience to meet people and fall in love.

      Could this maybe be a thing that EU somehow makes better here, versus e.g the US that I can sadly imagine would actually give all the tools for the companies to actively make it an eternal search… it feels to me it’s too good an experience for most I know for our experience to be the outlier. Why would people use it anyway, if it didn’t work?

      • @knexcar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 hours ago

        Jodel? The app used exclusively by my coworkers to post memes about their job, and seemingly not much else?

        • @orgrinrt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          39 hours ago

          Well, it’s been a few years now, but there used to be a fairly active hookup scene in this town, though that wasn’t my scene. It’s all things local at least here. Often people would just message you for various reasons, whatever you post, and sometimes it’d just lead to things once you chat a bit. I don’t think you could post memes or whatever back then, you could only take pictures with camera, couldn’t attach arbitrary images (e.g memes).

  • @zarathustra0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    7821 hours ago

    I think the way you’re supposed to do it now is to post one of the JD Vance memes into c/196 and try DMing the first person who comments. Rinse and repeat until the desired outcome is achieved.

  • @cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5821 hours ago

    From my understanding (and experience) dating apps/online dating in general is dead, fucked up beyond repair by capitalism, toxic incels, predators, scammers, crooks and most recently AI. No technology can possibly survive such an onslaught and most of them wouldn’t profit from doing so. They have a financial incentive to attract repeat customers.

    In person meeting and dating should be the obvious alternative, but apparently nobody goes out socializing anymore since COVID and nobody can afford hobbies because of the economy and chronic social malaise and terminal online doomscrolling has broken people’s ability to form human connection anyway so I think civilization is probably just ending after these last few generations, frankly.

    If there is a useful option I’d love to know what it is too.

    • @xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day
      link
      fedilink
      English
      513 hours ago

      dating apps/online dating in general is dead, fucked up beyond repair by capitalism, toxic incels, predators, scammers, crooks and most recently AI. No technology can possibly survive such an onslaught and most of them wouldn’t profit from doing so. They have a financial incentive to attract repeat customers

      Thank you for writing exactly what I was thinking.

      I heard that Japan is starting to implement a government sponsored/made matchmaking app. The core advantage is that the intention of the platform is to actually match people and make people have babies. Plus, if someone is being naughty, the penalties can be much higher than a simple account ban.

    • @iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      1820 hours ago

      My coworker met someone on Hinge, I think it was, just a year ago and they’re moving in together.

      Not trying to say it’s easy but I don’t think it’s useless.

      • @Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        1120 hours ago

        A friend of mine also found their long-term partner on Hinge. Dating apps are kinda dead, but if you’re looking for something other than hookups, it seems like Hinge is one of the better options.

        • Pelicanen
          link
          fedilink
          17 hours ago

          Found my partner on Hinge as well, so it kind of per definition isn’t useless. That being said, I don’t think one should invest too much time and energy into it since online dating can be incredibly emotionally and mentally draining.

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      420 hours ago

      I think civilization is probably just ending after these last few generations, frankly

      Someone’s probably trying to stop that already, in a way. Low(er) sentences for rape and abortion bans. Maybe will be followed by something else, like decreasing age of consent. Or banning things like hysterectomy, salpingectomy, vasectomy.
      All the good solutions /s

  • @whyrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1517 hours ago

    A similar question was asked about 2 weeks ago; I was going to link to that but it was since deleted; so here’s a copy & paste of my reply instead. Note payment wasn’t raised in that discussion; my response to that would be: is potentially meeting people interested in dating you worth the fee (to me that answer was yes)? If a service provides value to me I’m happy to pay a reasonable amount.


    A lot of negative comments. I went through a divorce last year (male, mid 40s), and used dating apps when I was ready to start meeting people. I was apprehensive going in but ended up shocked by how positive the results were. After a week or two I would have several matches and pause searching while I talked with those and planned in-person meetings. Most profiles you’ll never get a reply. Of those you match again, half likely never respond to initial introductions / questions. But, if you live in a major metro area there’s still plenty of people looking for relationships if you’re willing to filter through that. I’m now happily in a relationship for the past few months so I’ve stopped using these apps.

    I tried 3: eHarmony, hinge, and bumble. Here’s my feedback from best to worse.

    Hinge: encourages discussion as an initial match prompt. I met the most people on this app and many matches led to in person dates. Met the person I’m currently dating seriously on here.

    Bumble: costs money to send a comment / question, free to “just swipe”. Kept showing me profiles for people currently within my search distance, but who have listed another major city as their home (I guess they’re connecting through the airport and on the app?). Went on multiple dates with matches, fewer than hinge.

    eHarmony: where I originally met my previous wife ~20 years ago. Now had the fewest matches and worst experience (and highest cost). I stopped checking this one after about a month. Went on only 1 date.

    Feedback from my matches about the app: many men are using it to find people to cheat with / aren’t serious about a relationship. All of them told me actually holding a conversation on the app put me in the “top tier” of their matches. Many shared that matches just gave super short answers then asked for a phone number. Several noted that half the time they shared a number they almost immediately received dick pics. Multiple said matches tried to get them into crypto (?!?!).

    For me (busy work schedule, and still spend half my time with kids) the experience was far better than any dates friends or co workers suggested. The profiles are not super deep… Yes everyone loves live music, travel, and The Office. I wanted to connect over something more specific than that. At least the people you match with are also looking for a relationship. Meeting people through my hobbies at 40+ most are in long term relationships or not interested in starting one. The apps are largely superficial… Half the first dates I went on one or both of us decided not to have a second date. Which is honestly expected… Even after filtering through the profiles and messaging in app you still only know the basics for most people.

    For you specifically: many matches took issue with the recent timing of my divorce. If you’re separated (not divorced) expect that to be a deal breaker for many.

    • noughtnaut
      link
      fedilink
      314 hours ago

      I looked into this not too long ago. Got them to share their user profile numbers - 50k - but I’ve a strong feeling that the majority of those are dummy test profiles.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        24 hours ago

        I guess mine was. I wanted to try it out, but I’m not willing to give away that much of my privacy to any website so it was pretty useless. There was literally nothing: fill out a form and I guess there are supposed to be emails of responses. I live in a major metropolitan area and never got any, but I refused to give details so that’s not a surprise.

        I just thought there’d be something to see before I committed my privacy

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      But you can’t self-host it??? Blaspheme! /s

      Just kidding, nice to know there’s something out there.


      There’s also Duolicious which is similarly free and without ads but there was literally no one within a hundred miles of me and most of the people using it were about half my age so it felt fruitless to pursue.

      EDIT: same with Alovoa… nobody within 100 miles…

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Plentyoffish mostly stinks but still has a free tier where you can message one person a day.

    Also, on the page where you look at people who have viewed/liked you, the photos are blurred but if you use the Web Developer Inspection Tool you can see the unblurred photo:

    Right click on one of the images of who you want to see and in the dropdown menu click “Inspect”:

    The Web Developer tools will pop up and should auto-locate you to the image in question. In Firefox you can just hover over the image location and view a preview of the image. You can also right click on the image location and “Open Link in New Tab” to view it.

    From here, you can usually find them in your list of potential matches, in your “meet me” swipes, or in the recently online list. This way, if someone swipes right on you, you can find them without paying and can decide to match or message.

    Cheers and good luck!

  • @liverbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1221 hours ago

    I went on quite a few dates on Bumble & Tinder, which have pay options, but you don’t HAVE to pay.

    Facebook dating seemed a little higher quality (somehow).

    Please create a good profile that has: Some of your own words, at LEAST three RECENT pics, and NO fish pics. It didn’t work for me, but good luck!

  • @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Heck, are there dating sites that work at all anymore? Over a decade ago I had some success with OkCupid but my impression is that ever since swipe apps became a thing, online dating went from bad to terrible for everyone except gay men looking for hookups. Now I might have to go low-tech and ask my grandma to introduce me to her friends’ single granddaughters…

    • @Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Ugh, the “swipe” is the worst feature for every company to jump on. I get paralyzed between, “What if they just took a bad picture? I don’t know enough about them and dismissing them for a bad photo could mean missing out,” and “What if I’m swiping right on a creep and don’t realize it? Now they’ll know my picture, my name, where I live, and they’ll think I’m definitely interested.”

      I haven’t used it in a couple years, but I did meet my current boyfriend on OK Cupid. I’m poly, and I met my girlfriend last year on a queer dating/social app called Lex. The cool thing with Lex is that it’s text-based, originally modeled off of old newspaper classified ads. You get to know people through them voicing their thoughts and asking original questions. No pressure to “swipe or get off the pot,” you can get to know someone through comments on posts before sending a message. It’s a smaller community (as expected for queer folk) so I don’t know how popular it is outside of highly populated areas. It’s not for everyone, but if you’re in the LGBTQ+ community and sick of being forced to make snap-judgements about strangers who might end up being a massive part of your life, it’s a relief.

    • ViatorOmnium
      link
      fedilink
      English
      415 hours ago

      If any work it’s a bug. “Dating” apps don’t want to be dating apps, they want to be hookup apps because that’s how they can keep repeat customers. The only way dating apps would remain dating apps under for profit companies is if they found a way to charge a subscription for long term relationships.