And we’re talking about fizzy water which could mean either

Not everyone likes the taste of quinine it’s super bitter bro

You’re like 20 hours after someone already said that.

Oh well if you don’t believe in free will or self then of course

Well that’s not the definition, so you’re probably not understanding because that’s not what most people mean.

Even so you can’t imagine why someone would want somebody else dead? Why someone would or could feel that way?

Hating a person, to me, is like hating a hurricane or a volcano.

Explain how, please. Because one is uncontrollable nature and the other has free will and chooses to do terrible things.

I’m not asking how you do it. I’m asking how your comparison makes any sense to you? I can understand not getting upset about things, choosing to, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t find them upsetting.

This isn’t Southern California media wtf, mate!

Oh so it’s a really fucking stupid joke, based on noting but a name in the article

I dunno, what you’re saying seems ungenuine. you can’t name someone you hate because you don’t think about them?

Maybe you don’t understand what hate means. It doesn’t mean you’re obsessed with disliking them, it means intense dislike.

It doesn’t mean you spend time thinking about them. I hate(d) certain people in my life and if I was forced into a room with them I’d feel that feeling of intense dislike, but otherwise I don’t think about them. But I won’t pretend I don’t hate anyone just because I’m not actively discussing or thinking/feeling my feelings about that person

There’s a saying in therapy “if you’re mad now just wait until your wife cheats on you”

No wait, that’s also just made up.

Reading is hard, huh buddy?

Didn’t even make it to the first line of the second paragraph, huh?

Wtf is this comment

Projecting much?

If only we were SO STRONG!!!

She has a dictionary, yeah.

Thanks, I appreciate it. The witch’s evil pendant doesn’t have a spell check. (Ironic, I think so)

Because remember you need a Nazi and a tankie to agree with facts in order for it to be the real truth.

Sometimes reality doesn’t align with political views. Doesn’t mean it’s not facts

Because he’d do what about another country banning a privately owned website?

Eh?

Hahahahahaha

Fuck’em

But the pendant in me points out that the company didn’t change an internal policy for what they consider mental illness, just now theyre allowing hate speech “free* speech”

Now I wonder if that would pass muster as a legal argument - meta doesn’t necessarily believe this as our policy, but we allow people to express their hate on this platform

Touchadafishie