Previously LGPL, now re-licensed as closed-source/commercial. Previous code taken down.

Commercial users pay $99/year, free for personal use but each user has to make a free account after a trial period.

  • @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    41
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Fork the last commit with a LGPL commit?

    GPL mentions explicitly that it is irrevocable, where as LGPL doesn’t mention anything about it. IANAL, but it looks like there is a case for irrevocable without violation of clauses by default https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/4012/are-licenses-irrevocable-by-default#4013

    For people considering contributing to FOSS in the future, maybe check for irrevocable clauses? I wish licenses selectors https://choosealicense.com highlighted this part more clearly.

    • @CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      139 months ago

      Also depends on the contributions terms.

      If they were a traditional FOSS, they can’t change the terms without all contributors agreeing or removing/modifying the contributed code so that they no longer have ownership of their authored sections.

      Either way, it’s a dick move.

      • mborus
        link
        fedilink
        59 months ago

        @fidodo @SkyNTP Sure, but unless that someone keeps it updated that fork will be useless soon. And that looks like a lot of (unpaid) work.

        I like the project (was surprised to even see my user name in the contributor list) but stopped using it because I couldn’t get accessibility working (mainly no full keyboard shortcuts).

        For me, buying a yearly developer license to have a few GUI pop-ups at work is something I’ll only consider if I run out of options.