When Al-Qaeda themselves claimed responsibility, even with overwhelming evidence aside? Why were so many people still reluctant, I was researching about this stuff and was shocked to see people who I respect a lot believe in this

  • @Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    -11 year ago

    Some would call them “independent thinkers”

    What’s more admirable, to conform and be right or to think independently and be wrong?

      • @Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No doubt. But dang, when they call themself right because they quote the most popular authority, I feel a strong impulse to play it wrong.

        I mean, I’d push flat-eartherism just to highlight the absurdity of the popular epistemology. But that’s generally a pearls-before-swine situation.

              • @Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I dunno man. The ugly sciencey guy is a hard sell. There’s gotta be a third option.

                Smiling grandfather in nice suit? Sexy fascist lady? Furry?

                It’s all theater anyway. The mob does not respond to reason.

                  • @Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Or we could just do what’s proven to work.

                    One lie-spewing puppet for the people who like vanilla. Another for those who prefer chocolate. Maybe a third for those strawberry-loving weirdos.

                    We want to keep them (the oblivious masses) marching in the right direction. That’s all. Truth is utterly beside the point.