ijeff to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agoOne year after being bought for $44 billion, X is worth $19 billionarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square217fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down155
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1external-linkOne year after being bought for $44 billion, X is worth $19 billionarstechnica.comijeff to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square217fedilink
minus-square@dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish18•2 years agoIs this the wikipedia-argument back at him? The whole twitter post history could fit on a single hard drive, so why are people paying for it?
minus-square@wildginger@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoThat argument is unfair anyway, cause what fits on a hard drive gets bigger every year.
minus-square@CleoTheWizard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoNo it’s completely fair because the value of information deflates as we gain better ability to store it! /s
minus-square@Meowoem@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoAnd there’s endless examples of a small well ordered thing being far more expensive than essentially the same thing less ordered in bigger volume - a room full of carbon dioxide, a bag of coal, a diamond…
Is this the wikipedia-argument back at him? The whole twitter post history could fit on a single hard drive, so why are people paying for it?
That argument is unfair anyway, cause what fits on a hard drive gets bigger every year.
No it’s completely fair because the value of information deflates as we gain better ability to store it! /s
And there’s endless examples of a small well ordered thing being far more expensive than essentially the same thing less ordered in bigger volume - a room full of carbon dioxide, a bag of coal, a diamond…