• @fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    715 hours ago

    That’s what they’re banking on, but we know that eventually they will f*** it up and lose everyone.

    • @FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -213 hours ago

      Unless we have some serious alternatives, that won’t happen anytime soon

      Video hosting is really expensive. Every service running for free will eventually enshitify and turn out similar, because there’s no such thing as free massive servers

      • @brisk@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 hour ago

        Peertube has already delivered the sustainable model: creators host their own videos and viewers assist distribution.

        • @FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 minutes ago

          Who pays for the servers? Because if even big platforms like Signal sometimes struggle to pay the bills, in part because they spend a lot on their servers, then it’ll be dozens of times worse with video hosting

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
          link
          fedilink
          English
          245 minutes ago

          All they need that I see is missing, is a way to discover / search everyone from any instance. Like, a consolidated / federated search.

      • @Rin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 hours ago

        It is… they’ve out spent the competition. Now that no one else is around, they’re trying to make all the money they can. Luckily, it won’t be long before some other alternative will pop up anyway.