Text:

I consent to Plex to: (i) sell certain personal information (hashed emails, advertising identifiers) to third-parties for advertising and marketing purposes; and (ii) store and/or access certain personal information (advertising identifiers, IP address, content being watched) on my device(s) and share that information with Plex’s advertising partners. This data is used to deliver personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Your consent applies to all devices on which you have Plex installed. You can withdraw your consent at any time in Account Settings or using this page.

Soure: https://www.plex.tv/vendors/ (Might have to clear cache)

Can also read about the changes here: https://www.plex.tv/about/privacy-legal/

  • Saik0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Not without additional context it’s not… Is your service 8gbps? Do you have SLAs in place? Will your ISP send you hate mail after using a mere 10TB of data?

    • @MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 days ago

      I don’t need 8gbps. What would I be doing with that? My internet is not capped either. You’re comparing a good doméstic internet connection with a business level service…

      It’s like saying your 10k build is better than a 500$ PS5 for playing games. It obviously is, but I can still play the same game.

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 days ago

        Are you okay?

        I didn’t compare mine to yours at all. You’re the one that said your 28 USD service was a better deal. YOU made the comparison. YOU asked for the details.

        • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 days ago

          No, he provided details for his internet first. You’re the one who came in comparing your business contract internet with his non-business one. Did you just conveniently forget that?

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            04 days ago

            You need to scroll up and pay attention.

            Them:

            My ISP offers symmetrical […] glad I’m not American

            Me:

            As someone living in America, I have great internet

            Them:
            <Requests direct information about cost>

            Me:
            <I oblige>

            Them:
            <makes a comparison without qualifying anything about the comparison, claiming theirs to be superior>

            Me:
            <calls it out>

            They provided no details at all… this whole engagement. We still don’t actually know what speeds they even get for their mere 28USD. Could be 100mbps and it would be significantly worse by ever metric than my 8gbps. I can’t compare my service to something that we have no details for.

            • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              04 days ago

              He provided details about his non-business internet being symmetrical and YOU compared it to your business contract line, that’s literally how it started.

              The cost is to prove that Americans do not have easy access to the same level of internet his country has, which is his main point. You needed to purchase a business line to have it symmetrical, which is not accessible to the everyone.

              Just because you can pay 100 times the cost of healthcare in European countries to get high quality heathcare in America, it doesn’t mean the average American can afford to go to the hospital or that your healthcare system is just as good. The same thing applies to your internet.

              • Saik0
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 days ago

                He provided details about his non-business internet being symmetrical and YOU compared it to your business contract line, that’s literally how it started.

                To my residential house… of which my neighbor can get the same service, under a residential contract. Also they didn’t say if their internet was residential or not.

                The cost is to prove that Americans do not have easy access to the same level of internet his country has, which is his main point. You needed to purchase a business line to have it symmetrical, which is not accessible to the everyone.

                No. My neighbor can also get 8/8, under a different SLA as residential. I only provided “under business contract” because that changes the price.

                Just because you can pay 100 times the cost of healthcare in European countries to get high quality heathcare in America, it doesn’t mean the average American can afford to go to the hospital or that your healthcare system is just as good. The same thing applies to your internet.

                You’re not making a good look for your stance when you over hyperbolize the situation. I pay 5.89 times more… for what could be 8-80 times more speed. We don’t know because THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION.

                • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  14 days ago

                  If your neighbour can also get symmetrical internet with a residential contract, then that would be the better example to prove his point wrong.

                  A business contract is not a good comparison because they usually are symmetrical for a premium price regardless of the quality of the residential internet in your area.

                  Even in my country you can get symmetrical internet with a business contract, yet I’ll never claim my country’s internet is comparable to one that do provide it for a normal residential connection, because we don’t have that option here.

                  And he did say his internet was a normal domestic internet, btw.

                  You’re not making a good look for your stance when you over hyperbolize the situation.

                  I needed to hyperbolize the situation because you can’t seem to grasp why a business line wasn’t a good comparison, as you can see from how it works in my country. All you needed to do was provide the point that the symmetrical internet is not exclusive to a business contract and it would have made your argument completely valid.

                  • Saik0
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    04 days ago

                    If your neighbour can also get symmetrical internet with a residential contract, then that would be the better example to prove his point wrong.

                    Sure, but I don’t get their bill now do I?

                    A business contract is not a good comparison because they usually are symmetrical for a premium price regardless of the quality of the residential internet in your area.

                    Which was the point of me bringing it up… my price is likely higher than my neighbor. But I know that the same speeds are available. Symmetric.

                    Once again though… Without more information we can’t actually compare but at face value… I pay 5.89 times for for presumably 8-80 times more speed. EVEN ON MY BUSINESS CONTRACT. Hard to say that their service is categorically better than mine…