For me, it was perhaps simple-scan, a very simple and efficient GUI to scan documents. I used it with my Brother printer / scanner and it works like a charm. Especially since I do not scan stuff often, so a program with more complex UI would have the effect that I forget how to use it until the next time.

    • @Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1519 days ago

      I’m pretty neutral about the mere existence of software I’m not interested in using.

      • circuitfarmer
        link
        fedilink
        719 days ago

        I think MS assumes no one will use it. But having Linux builds of some of their software enhances their “MS loves Linux” marketing.

        Teams is another example.

        • ElectricMachman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          119 days ago

          MS no longer produces an official Teams binary for Linux. (Correct me if they’ve started doing so again)

          • circuitfarmer
            link
            fedilink
            219 days ago

            Fair – what I meant was more about the Teams binary kind of not being needed at all (you can use the web version without it). So having a Linux binary explicitly just seems a little weird, marketing aside.