@Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • edit-23 days agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-square50fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down13
arrow-up163arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?@Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • edit-23 days agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-square@kent_eh@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 days ago They already have - having Nukes. That only defends against a sane leadership with a military chain of command that isn’t compromised.
minus-square@FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.aulinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 day agoSeems to have gone pretty well for the last 80 years or so. Don’t see any reason why that would change.
That only defends against a sane leadership with a military chain of command that isn’t compromised.
Seems to have gone pretty well for the last 80 years or so. Don’t see any reason why that would change.