• @BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago
      • Woman’s brother was killed in a road rage incident
      • In preparing her victim impact statement for the court, she struggled to find a way to properly represent her brother’s voice
      • Her husband works with AI and helped her generate a video of her brother for the victim impact statement
      • The video was very well received and apparently true to her brother’s personality. Though she didn’t forgive the killer, she knew her brother would. So, in the AI video, “he” did.
      • After all the real people made their statements to the judge, the video was played
      • The judge loved it and thanked the woman
      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 months ago

        In preparing her victim impact statement for the court, she struggled to find a way to properly represent her brother’s voice

        Should clarify that the woman wrote the script. The AI just generated the voice and image. The AI read the woman’s script who wrote it in the tone of her brother putting aside her own feelings.

      • @etchinghillside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        Appreciated – my apologies that I wasn’t clear. I was curious about the connection to “did we learn nothing from doom 2016” that the OP referenced.

      • @etchinghillside@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 months ago

        I was wondering what happened in “doom 2016”. And now I can’t tell if you’re summarizing the article or what happened in doom 2016.

          • @catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            How does that relate to videos of dead people speaking someone else’s words? The only reanimated people in Doom 2016 are the shambling zombies.