• @captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1121 month ago

    “Previously, investors in OpenAI’s commercial entity were capped at making 100 times their money before the rest of its profits flowed back to the nonprofit.

    With the new PBC subsidiary, OpenAI spokesperson Steve Sharpe tells me that investors and employees will own regular stock with no cap on how much it can appreciate. “

    They got exactly what they want anyway. This is no victory.

    • NoSpotOfGround
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This doesn’t make sense to me. The ultimate value of shares is in the dividends they represent, no? If there are no dividends ever, what are they sharing in? Is it just a postponement until future dividends? A share in control of activities?

      I get that there’ll be speculation that will keep values increasing, and selling can net a profit, but what does the last share-holder get?

        • @monogram@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 month ago

          This is just every economic endeavour in existence nowadays, the issue with cryptocurrency is that it contains no guard rails (+ environmental issues)

          Unless you work for a corporation, ask your employer what their exit strategy is.

      • @MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Technology and intellectual property, including patents. These are only put up for sale if the company is liquidated or declared bankrupt.

    • Dzso
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      This doesn’t sound like a nonprofit.

    • @Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      630 days ago

      The billions of dollars the company raised in its last two funding rounds were contingent on successfully removing this limit on investor returns.