• I mean, that’s entirely assuming that Microsoft also accepts that the use of Copilot requires no documentation. And given that Microsoft does have decades of experience dealing with users doing all kinds of dumb shit, they might not necessarily agree.

    • Andrew
      link
      fedilink
      210 days ago

      @ChairmanMeow that doesn’t strike me as a particularly strong argument for directing those users to a system that will sometimes just make stuff up?

            • Andrew
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              @ChairmanMeow Sure, but in this scenario you already have the relevant page of documentation open in front of you, so why would you *want* to know that Copilot exists?

                • Andrew
                  link
                  fedilink
                  19 days ago

                  @ChairmanMeow ok, but again,

                  1. There is no reason to ask copilot to do this relatively simple task if you have the docs open in front of you

                  2. If you have to look up instructions for how to prompt copilot to do something then there is no reason for copilot to exist

                  Just give me one realistic scenario where this information helps someone other than Microsoft’s KPI tracking executives

                    1. Perhaps true, the value of LLM prompting instructions are probably limited.

                    2. I disagree with the premise that requiring instructions on how to prompt Copilot for something eliminates the reason for Copilot to exist. Copilot is a tool and just like any other tool it may require some instructions for someone who is new to it. You and I might find it intuitive, but Joe Shmo might not.