@thewanderingbackpack@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 1 month agoShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?message-square73fedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down16
arrow-up143arrow-down1message-squareShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?@thewanderingbackpack@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 1 month agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareMayor PoopingtonlinkfedilinkEnglish23•1 month agoRed Hot Chili Peppers is now considered “classic rock”
minus-square@inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink12•1 month agoOofh. Oh yeah, that one hurts. Time is a bitch. I disapprove of the whole concept.
minus-square@TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-21 month agoTime is relative. A 5 year old piece of software is ancient. A 100 year old stone church is very recent. If you find a stone axe that isn’t at least 10 000 years old, you can toss it back where you found it.
minus-square@jordanlund@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•1 month agoIn before Muzak version of Blood Sugar Sex Magik. :) https://youtu.be/zRjYSAwJ_Kw
Red Hot Chili Peppers is now considered “classic rock”
Oofh. Oh yeah, that one hurts.
Time is a bitch. I disapprove of the whole concept.
Time is relative. A 5 year old piece of software is ancient. A 100 year old stone church is very recent. If you find a stone axe that isn’t at least 10 000 years old, you can toss it back where you found it.
In before Muzak version of Blood Sugar Sex Magik. :)
https://youtu.be/zRjYSAwJ_Kw