@misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agoFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square288fedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down110
arrow-up1637arrow-down1external-linkFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.com@misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square288fedilink
minus-square@gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoWell, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
minus-square@grue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoFrom what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
minus-square@enumerator4829@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoBecause you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
minus-square@gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoI thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?
Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
I thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?