Silver's Home
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
stoiclime to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years ago

Twitter Blue subscribers can now hide their blue checks

www.theverge.com

external-link
message-square
137
fedilink
678
external-link

Twitter Blue subscribers can now hide their blue checks

www.theverge.com

stoiclime to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years ago
message-square
137
fedilink
Now nobody can tell if you paid for Twitter or not.
  • countsickness
    link
    fedilink
    79•2 years ago

    So I guess now you can get your tweets pushed without disclosing that you payed for it…?

    • @Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30•2 years ago

      That’s a bingo

      • @xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3•2 years ago

        “We just say bingo”

    • @jupiter_jazz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6•2 years ago

      Ah that makes more sense.

    • @anyone_yun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4•2 years ago

      That must be the true reason behind this move

    • @Dreta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4•2 years ago

      Is this actually legal?

      • countsickness
        link
        fedilink
        6•2 years ago

        I am asking myself the same thing. But unless it’s actually advertising I guess the answer is yes.

        Might get interesting with twitter gold or whatever color the brand checkmate is.

        • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1•2 years ago

          Why were you asking yourself that. How would it possibly be illegal?

      • @jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2•2 years ago

        Twitter can do whatever the hell they want on their own website. They have no obligation to be fair in whatever they decide to boost or hide (with the exception of outright illegal content, obviously).

      • @WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1•2 years ago

        How would that be illegal? What law in which country would have anything to do with how a privately owned company handles that?

    • @anlumo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0•2 years ago

      They’re Xes, not tweets.

Technology@lemmy.world

!technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
  • 5.19K users / day
  • 9.96K users / week
  • 17.7K users / month
  • 37.6K users / 6 months
  • 70.1K subscribers
  • 14.9K Posts
  • 653K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu
  • Technopagan
  • L4sBot
  • L3s
  • @L4s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org