Techie to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1790arrow-down114cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprogramming@programming.dev
arrow-up1776arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square101fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprogramming@programming.dev
minus-square@shalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoSometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?
minus-square@AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoI believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
minus-square@shalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoBut that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0
Sometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?
It would add to adds 🤣 @shalva97 @joe
I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.
But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0