• @nyctre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Main difference is the fact that the aeropress uses a paper filter which filters out sediment and oils giving the coffee a “cleaner” taste. From my research before I bought it, I remember it also being slightly healthier because, again, you filter out those oils.

    • This changes alot though, because of the filter, the aeropress can take finer grounds than the french press. Also when you press, you press all the water through the grounds.

    • @Lizardking13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Interesting. I don’t know if I’d ever describe the coffee I brew as oily or anything like that. I suppose I have to try this sometime.

      • @nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Oh, no. It’s not oily. Just a bit thicker. Like espresso. That’s partly because of the oils that coffee has.

      • @nyctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not quite. I said that was the main difference, but if we go into details, the physics of the thing, it’s a bit more complicated. The guy who invented the aeropress, afaik, tried to make a handmade espresso replacement. He didn’t succeed, but the way the aeropress works is a hybrid of immersion, percolation and pressure brewer, whereas the french press is all about immersion and that it’s. It has the plunger, but that’s for filtering, nothing else.

        If anything, I think the aeropress is closer to a moka pot than anything. But it’s its own thing, honestly.