@sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoLinux geeks cheer as Arm wrestles x86 • The Registerwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1174arrow-down15
arrow-up1169arrow-down1external-linkLinux geeks cheer as Arm wrestles x86 • The Registerwww.theregister.com@sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square68fedilink
minus-square@bamboo@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•1 year agoWell, not exactly. You have to remove instructions at some point. That’s what Intel’s x86-S is supposed to be. You lose some backwards compatibility but they’re chosen to have the least impact on most users.
minus-square@bamboo@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•1 year agoInstruction decoding takes space and power. If there are fewer, smaller transistors dedicated to the task it will take less space and power.
Well, not exactly. You have to remove instructions at some point. That’s what Intel’s x86-S is supposed to be. You lose some backwards compatibility but they’re chosen to have the least impact on most users.
deleted by creator
Instruction decoding takes space and power. If there are fewer, smaller transistors dedicated to the task it will take less space and power.