• @nyctre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    He’s literally using the wrong pronouns and name for his transgender daughter. He’s literally said he agrees with JK Rowling’s transphobic comments.

    You know how after a certain time has passed it’s no longer a spoiler to talk about how Vader is Luke’s father? Well, there’s certain stuff that’s so obvious and widely known that people will stop believing that you don’t know about it and will assume you’re trolling.The fact that you keep insisting that you haven’t seen evidence of him being queerphobe is on you at this point, imo.

    • @dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -1910 days ago

      The fact that you keep insisting that you haven’t seen evidence of him being queerphobe is on you at this point

      I wholeheartedly agree, it’s just that I haven’t seen it, and that doesn’t mean he is NOT queerphobic. I was simply asking questions. If you don’t like that, what can I do about that?

      • @Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1510 days ago

        Have you also not seen enough to learn why the “just asking questions” justification isn’t super effective around here?

        It’s used as thinly veiled cover for spreading malicious bullshit while pretending the speaker isn’t lying to their audience. I’m not accusing you of this, in fact I’m explaining it hoping that you’re genuine.

        • @dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -710 days ago

          yes I had a feeling actually. But jesus fuck that is depressing, how else should one phrase it then? I try hard to think people are not dumber than decades ago, but it’s seriously hard to keep on believing that sometimes. Now I have to jump through hoops just in order to be perceived as neutral? I’m out.

          • @Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            710 days ago

            Yeah it’s depressing and stupid, but for what it’s worth, it is much less about you and much more about all the bad faith fucknuggets out there who have spent decades learning to mimic good faith curious people.

      • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 days ago

        I utterly detest the use of “wholeheartedly agree” when people have caveats. It truly goes against the concept of wholeheartedness. It is sufficient to indicate that you agree completely and then be silent. That you don’t suggests your caveat has more value and meaning to you than the point you are ‘wholeheartedly’ agreeing with.

        You are either being willfully obtuse or are actively a troll. Either way, we’ve all already used up more metabolism on you than is worthwhile. If you cannot bother to be informed about something as easy to know as this, and yet spout off multiple replies to defend your position, then you’re not here in good faith.

        • @dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -710 days ago

          I said I “wholeheartedly agree” with “it being on me” that I haven’t seen something. Obviously. How can it not? Is it on you? No. You’re being so incredibly stupid and prejudiced that it’s hard to fathom. Now fuck off, you’re right about wasting metabolism