@smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square211fedilinkarrow-up1864arrow-down110
arrow-up1854arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.com@smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square211fedilink
minus-square@Flipper@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish20•1 year agoHave you looked at the naming of the usb standards? No you havn’t otherwise you wouldn’t make this sensible suggestion.
minus-squarestrawberrylinkfedilink6•1 year agothe shenenigans with USB 3 naming you mean? you’re right, this would be too logical for USB lol
minus-square@Flipper@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoDon’t worry, they made it worse with usb 4.
minus-square@Flipper@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoUSB 3.2 2x2 with 20 Gbps is the same as USB 4 Gen 2×2 with 20 Gbps USB 4 Gen3x2 has 40 Gbps and was then renamed to USB 4 1.0
Have you looked at the naming of the usb standards? No you havn’t otherwise you wouldn’t make this sensible suggestion.
the shenenigans with USB 3 naming you mean? you’re right, this would be too logical for USB lol
Don’t worry, they made it worse with usb 4.
oh they did? how so?
USB 3.2 2x2 with 20 Gbps is the same as USB 4 Gen 2×2 with 20 Gbps
USB 4 Gen3x2 has 40 Gbps and was then renamed to USB 4 1.0
jesus what the fuck