• @OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      The goal is to not let them take their fucking money and run. Because then it would be real… So you come up with a new idea, a better idea, a NEW STOCK.

      IYKYK 😂

  • Flamekebab
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2613 days ago

    Without proper consequences their behaviour will continue.

  • toiletobserver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2413 days ago

    Profiteering is the wrong word.

    Instead, crony capitalism, abuse of power, or something else is more appropriate

    • Cyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      712 days ago

      Instead, crony capitalism, abuse of power, or something else is more appropriate

      So, standard capitalism stuff?

      • toiletobserver
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 days ago

        Kind of, except the person doing it is the sitting president. Call it an aggravating factor.

      • toiletobserver
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1913 days ago

        Using their position of political power to advertise a business which directly benefits them. It is plainly not part of the duties of the office. Same reason good presidents put their financial affairs in a blind trust for the duration of of their term.

      • @rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1012 days ago

        For giggles, I’d like you to explain how the President of the United States launching his old overpriced phone on his own overpriced network with every possible element named, adorned and even priced after himself could be considered anything other than abusing their power?

        • @untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -112 days ago

          he’s just selling something that his followers will buy. no one else really cares to.

          your logic could be even more effectively applied to him selling merchandise about him and that isn’t an overreach of power in any way

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            212 days ago

            Leveraging his office for profit? Yes. By definition it absolutely is

            He’s already been violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution.

  • @Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Let’s break down who’s actually going to buy this piece of shit.

    Anyone with any experience with buying a modern Android phone?.. Nope. Metro, Tello, US Cellular, etc are all cheaper than Trump Mobile by almost half the price and the phone itself is a REVVL variant selling for $500, and Apple fans aren’t watching anyway.

    So that just leaves extremely uninformed people who don’t know any better. You’ll be able to identify how little they know by the fact that they’ll pay double the going-rate of an MVNO for an overpriced, gold slab of feces.

    A lot of Apple fans are tied into their ecosystem, either by profession or just history with the brand. Any Android phone means upending their lives if they depend on their phones for business or pleasure, and a lot of them are Apple fans because Tim Cook keeps Trump 39.5ft away, so they’re off the books.

    TL/DR: Get ready to see a bunch of boomers walk out of church with gold phones.

    • @answersplease77@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      All his family coins are 95% down. The worse problem is that their coins were designed from the start with the sole purpose to draw donations indirectly to Trump ( and for favors in return? as the case was with Justin Sun, who is the #1 Trump coin holder, and he previously donated a million to trump to pardon him from his fraud case. )

      Both of the Trump and Malenia coin whitepapers, fee percentages, premined allocations and locked durations…etc everything shows clear as day that it’s a grift to the Trump family and that all coin revenues go to them that it’s impossible for the coin to gain any value.

      That’s not my opinion. Those are the facts that everyone has reported on already.

      • @Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 days ago

        Ow it was clear to me it was a Grift, it’s his only modus operandi.

        Thanks for the detailed write up, very insightful!

  • @hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Y’all, the last thing the suckers who will buy this want is some Nanny State telling them they can’t buy this.

    It’s a stupid fake phone. Let them buy it. Who cares? If not this, the grifters already have 700 other things lined up behind it. Let them pay for our schadenfreude, as they have done so many times before.

  • @untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1413 days ago

    this is just them making money off people who will willingly give them money

    its not some blatant overreach of power, at worst their using their fame as advertising for it

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      913 days ago

      The FCC, which licenses radio spectrum and makes the rules for device certification is part of the Executive branch. So are the CFPB and the SEC, or what’s left of them. He’s literally, corruptly leveraging his office to benefit his cons and preventing regulations from applying to himself and his cronies.

    • Ulrich
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They’re using the office of President to advertise products for personal gain. Not just any products but overpriced Chinese garbage. They’re also lying about them being made in the US, which is illegal.

      • @untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -212 days ago

        I’ve got a really good feeling that if sanders were president, and he was selling merchandise, using his position as POTUS to advertise for it, and said it was made in the us while its raw materials were made elsewhere, you’d be fine with that

        I’m no fan of trump, but this isn’t an overreach of power nearly as bad as you say it is. its not the job of there potus, but its also not harmful

        • Ulrich
          link
          fedilink
          English
          312 days ago

          Your “feelings” are deeply flawed. You know nothing about me.

    • @Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 days ago

      Let’s put it this way.

      Pretend I’m some semi-adversarial nation, like Saudi Arabia. I want trump to let off some sanctions, or tariffs, or in general give me preferential treatment compared to other nations. I want to give trump a big sum of money to do this, just writing him a check would be obvious corruption. So instead, I just book whole floors of his hotels during off-peak hours, and at a premium pricing. I don’t even bother having anyone stay in the rooms, so trump can even book those rooms again for additional money. I just “legitimately” sent trump a bunch of money, and now he is paying it forward by stopping investigations into my goons sawing journalists into tiny pieces.

      If this sounds to far-fetched for you, keep in mind that it literally happened.

      https://apnews.com/article/travel-business-saudi-arabia-malaysia-15835346f75bc5f152a58842eb7c8609

      This phone company trump has made really only exists as a bit of paper and some software. It has no infrastructure, no brick and mortar store fronts, nor any assets. It’s mostly an agreement with a large carriers to lease time on their networks, charged per usage amount. For this scenario, let’s pretend I’m Vladimir Putin trying to pay trump for leaving Ukraine high and dry. I simply put in orders for Trump’s phone service, and then never even use the phones. Hell, a physical phone is probably never sent. On paper, it looks like 100,000 people signed up for the service, but they never use any of the lines, so trump collects nearly 100% of the money, with just a little bit lost to keep a small server up to handle transactions and accounts.

      If none of this makes sense to you as an obvious vector for trump to receive money from foreign agents, then I’d guess that you’re the kind of person who thinks that the mob ran legitimate protection services.