• @lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        I’ve been leaning more and more towards using fdroid just to find apps and then using Obtainium to install them directly from source.

        • @smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          Same. I’m using Obtanium anyway for things that are github-only, no real need to have the clunky fdroid client installed as well.

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          Not saying its worse but I recall seeing an article about some change in policy with it but honestly I can’t find it now. Maybe it was fud.

          • @shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            I think I remember something about that, but I didn’t pay much attention to it at the time. I feel like whatever it was, it was rather recent, though.

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          did you read the other replies? nothing much but a bit back there was some article about changes in terms of paid for stuff. I can’t find it now though so not sure how real it was.

            • HubertManne
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              yeah I don’t really have enough details to be sure but like everything I like to have a backup plan.

  • JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    98 months ago

    What’s the point? Updating four apps four times as slowly simultaneously is the same as updating four apps at four times the speed consecutively, and you would have the same internet speed either way.

    • @unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      188 months ago

      In my experience (not in Android apps but in Arch Linux updates) parallel downloads are almost always waaay faster. Magnitudes faster. Using multiple cores? Is it the bottleneck actually enforced by the server? I don’t know, I just know it works.

      And if they did it, it’s because it works on Android too.

      • wander1236
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        That’s not how it was done before, though. It wouldn’t download update A, start installing A, then trigger downloading update B while A was installing. A would have to finish installing before B could even start downloading.

        Especially for smaller updates, the overhead of the network handshaking to start the download can actually make doing 3/4 downloads at once faster than sequencing them. For larger updates, it matters less, but it’s not a negative.

        You can still use an app while the update is downloading. You only can’t while the update is installing, and installations still have to happen sequentially (limitation of Android). It only really matters if you want to specifically use an update right away, but then you can just manually trigger the update for just that app.

  • Lucy :3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68 months ago

    I can update infinite packages at the same time in pacman tho 😎

  • AmidFuror
    link
    fedilink
    38 months ago

    Do I have to decline providing a method of payment 4 times for free apps, or just the once?

  • MeatPilot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    HOLY FUCK THIS IS AMAZING!

    Tap for spoiler

    I’ll never use this. Who the fuck does need this? I download a new app maybe once every 6 months.

    • @atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      158 months ago

      For updates? It works for updates too. I hope you’re updating apps more than every 6 months for security reasons.

    • Paradoxvoid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 months ago

      This is useful for updates so you’re not bottlenecked as much (if you don’t have automatic background updates set up).